For generations, we have actually been told that higher education is the best course to a better life. However too many students do not feel that way, and frequently with good reason: They are graduating with mountains of financial obligation and couple of profession prospects.
Last summer, Congress carefully introduced a new age of responsibility in higher education when it passed the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” Together with structured payment alternatives for student debtors, the law consists of overdue standards for revenues, developed to guarantee that higher education degrees leave students economically much better off than if they had actually stuck to a high school diploma alone.
These are important actions towards securing trainees and taxpayers alike. Yet there is still one glaring carve-out to the “do no damage” standard: certificate programs that often do not pay off.
Certificate programs might not get a lot of attention, however they are the fastest growing sector in college. Today, more than 1,280 programs register upward of 220,000 students every year, about 80 percent of them at for-profit institutions. Yet, regardless of longstanding concerns of predatory practices among many of these programs, Congress has actually continued to shield them from meaningful oversight.
Related: Intrigued in developments in higher education? Subscribe to our complimentary biweekly higher education newsletter
Take cosmetology schools, which represent 45 percent of certificate programs. For-profit cosmetology schools very first sprang up in the 1920s, as Hollywood gave rise to the first “it girls,” and along with them, new makeup and hair trends. After World War II, federal policies like the GI Bill and the College Act developed expansive financial aid programs intended to lift more Americans into the middle class.
They also led the way for predatory for-profit schools to game the system. Cosmetology schools needlessly raised tuition to rake in more financial aid dollars.
By the 1970s, bank regulators were sounding the alarm: cosmetology schools had actually become significant sources of waste and abuse. In 1971, a loan officer affirming to Congress confirmed that the largest increases in loans had been among “trade schools and so-called appeal or barber schools.”
The loan officer noted that while cosmetology schools comprised just a little, however growing, volume of the loan portfolio, they generated a significant part of loan defaults. “Who is taking advantage of these programs?” he asked. “Are the students benefiting, or are the school operators benefiting?”
We’re still asking that question 50 years later. Today, cosmetology schools market themselves to women and working moms and dads as a path to better pay and flexible hours. However research study reveals that many cosmetology trainees registered today will likely earn less than somebody who just has a high school diploma.
Related: Congress exempted charm schools from guidelines about how much graduates must earn
Tuition at some cosmetology programs can reach $20,000 a year, yet finishes from specific schools frequently leave for jobs earning simply over $17,000 a year, while burdened by a typical trainee loan debt of $11,000. At the same time, numerous schools utilize exploitative business practices under the guise of training programs.
For example, it prevails for cosmetology schools to have paying trainees “work the flooring,” basically making students cut hair and paint nails for no pay, while the school pockets the proceeds.
If any career education program required reform, it was cosmetology schools. So that begs the question: why did they get a pass?
The response lies, unsurprisingly, in Washington, D.C. As cosmetology schools grew in appeal, their powerful lobbying arm grew together with them. At every turn, the American Association of Cosmetology Schools has actually pushed against the basic accountability measures that other certificate programs are held to in this nation.
In 2023, when the Department of Education mandated that all career-oriented programs satisfy minimum earnings and debt-to-earnings requirements, the AACS sued to stop the rule from being put in place. They claimed that unreported ideas account for a significant part of a cosmetology graduate’s revenues, making the “minimum earnings requirement” an unreasonable concern for these schools.
Yet research study reveals that nearly 90 percent of hair salons do, in reality, report suggestions on W-2 forms. So, it ends up the concern was reasonable after all.
And what’s even worse is that these schools typically take advantage of low-income ladies and women of color, intensifying cycles of hardship for the really trainees they claim to help.
The “One Huge Beautiful Bill” was a chance for Congress to end the legal battle over reforming an inefficient market. Rather, it handed certificate programs, and thus cosmetology schools, an exception.
Related: How cosmetology schools mire trainees in debt
Helpfully, the Department of Education’s “do no harm” proposal would use existing authority to hold all programs liable for their earnings. With a final guideline on the costs’s arrangements expected by July 1, public debate continues, specifically as cosmetology schools lobby to influence the result.
Congress requires to revise the underlying statute to make clear their intent to hold all programs– consisting of certificate programs– to the earnings requirement. In the meantime, the U.S. Department of Education need to continue to persevere and impose guidelines that can keep low performers in check.
If a program regularly leaves its graduates worse off, it should lose access to federal student loans, just as an associate or bachelor’s degree program would. That way, schools that provide real value will endure, while others will be forced to reform or fail.
It’s time for cosmetology schools– and other certificate programs like them– to show that behind the glitter of big guarantees, there can be gold.
Kelly McManus is executive vice-president of education at Arnold Ventures. The Arnold Ventures has been amongst the numerous funders of The Hechinger Report.
Contact the opinion editor at [email protected]!.?.!. This story about certificate programs was
produced by The Hechinger Report, a nonprofit, independent news organization focused on inequality and development in education. Register for Hechinger’s weekly newsletter. Was this story practical? Leave a tip to support your education reporters. The Hechinger Report is a nonprofit newsroom
powered by reader support