This year’s yearly NAFSA Conference heard numerous discussions about the relative decrease of standard research study destinations amid increasing appeal of nations in Europe and Asia.
The launch of a brand-new report from Keystone Education Group, based on more than 67,000 potential students from 150 nations, verified the pattern, revealing the relative decline of the ‘big 4’ locations, with the largest drops seen in the US.
“Whereas the US remains the most-searched location throughout Keystone platforms, it’s losing ground in our study,” said Keystone VP of research and insight, Mark Bennett, highlighting the widening space between interest and intention.
Notably, the US ranked last out of the ‘huge four’ and China for trainee trust, though it was likewise the location where reactions were most polarised, tape-recording the highest portions of both “no trust” and “really high trust” reactions, revealing the large disparity of trainee perceptions.
For the 2nd year running, fewer trainees chose the US as their designated study destination, with the UK standing out as the main recipient of this shift and receiving the most interest at 21%, despite dealing with increased visa barriers itself.
Information: Keystone. Bennett warned delegates on the outright order of study outcomes, which, just like a lot of datasets, will always be formed by Keystone’s underlying audiences, with Asian locations under-indexing compared to Europe and The United States And Canada.
As such, the results are most useful for what they reveal about changing nation perceptions instead of relative size.
At AIRC’s Seminar the day prior to NAFSA, attendees became aware of the value of triangulating datasets, with speakers from IDP and StudyPortals– two data giants of the sector– stressing that every dataset captures just part of the image, prompting colleagues to look at various sources together and beware of verification predisposition. On the other hand in the Keystone report, Canada and Australia both showed modest healing after a 2025 slump due to policy instability, now taking up 3rd and 6th location respectively.
Bennett described that while the US’s recognized credibility suggests it still gathers substantial search interest, the practical truth of studying there means fewer students are picking it as their desired research study location.
Established, anglophone destinations keep their appeal with prospective audiences, but the barriers preventing them acting on that appeal are frequently policy-driven
Mark Bennett, Keystone Education Group
He shared data that saw the United States coming bottom of the ‘big 4’ in virtually every category, including cost, visas and entry, cultural appeal, and security and security. In Academic reputation, it ranked 3rd after the UK and Canada.
More broadly, the report compares trainee perceptions of the ‘big 4’, Asia and Europe, with the latter two regions ranking head and shoulders above the standard destinations for security and stability.
On the other hand: “It’s a close race on [scholastic] track record, but not a commanding lead for the big four,” said Bennett. “And the gap widens as we head into practical factors”.
“Once again, we see that conventional, established, anglophone locations keep their appeal with potential audiences, but the barriers preventing them acting on that appeal are frequently policy-driven: whether in terms of how safe trainees feel, [and] how affordable they discover research study.”
Elsewhere, the report provided more heartening sector news relating to AI, revealing that while AI tools are being used thoroughly by students looking into universities, trust remains in favour of editorially curated sources and institutional sites.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/IHCL-embedded.jpg"/ >