Speaking at The PIE Live Europe in London today, Clare Foyle, director of tactical preparation at UCL, informed the audience that the levy would be “absorbed into our typical thinking about tuition costs” rather than passed on directly to worldwide trainees.
“We have actually decided that [the levy] will not be passed on. It certainly will not be on the invoice,” she said.
Foyle acknowledged that taking in the costs– which is likely to hit UCL the hardest of any university, based upon its 2023/24 enrolment information– would inevitably have a knock-on impact other things it would be able to buy, such as class advancement or technical equipment.
“We’re definitely going to attempt and safeguard the important things that we think are truly, truly important for trainees, but it will decrease a few of the new and innovative things that we were wanting to do,” she stated.
“We would not see it as taking anything away, however it just decreases our procedure,” she added.
We’re definitely going to try and safeguard the important things that we think are really, actually crucial for trainees, but it will slow down a few of the new and innovative things that we were wanting to do
Clare Foyle, UCL
The panellists checked out how other English institutions would decide to come to grips with the levy throughout a session exploring the impact of the upcoming policy, which is expected to be carried out in 2028. Only English universities will be impacted by the policy, with Welsh politicians unequivocally mentioning that they would not be imposing a levy on institutions in Wales.
“The monetary pressures are actually pressing the sector to be more reactive, instead of proactive,” mentioned Janet Ilieva, creator and director of Education Insight, highlighting that some universities were stopping less popular programs– such as languages or agriculture– that, ironically, typically have some of the highest conclusion rates.
“This is where the sector holes up into a very reactive area, which wears down many margins,” she cautioned.
A straw poll of the audience recommended that most English universities are still weighing up their alternatives when it concerns choosing whether to up tuition charges in response to the policy.
Session chair Vincenzo Raimo, a worldwide college professional, said this tallied with the conversations he had been having with universities– that a lot of were exploring their options otherwise waiting to see how others would react to the policy before making a firm decision on their own method, although others said they would be passing the costs directly on to trainees.
“I believe numerous universities will attempt and stick to increased volume instead of considering the quality and the rate point,” recommended Jamie Warner, an independent college finance consultant.
The introduction of the levy has been a particularly controversial policy from the UK’s Labour government, with critics pointing out that the higher education sector– currently strapped for cash– might see a mass exodus of enrolments from price-sensitive sending out nations.
Ilieva stated that the UK was currently losing market share to emerging destinations due to the growing multi-polarity of the sector.
She pointed to research study recommending that a few of the crucial sending out countries to the UK– India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka– are especially cost delicate. And with continuous hostilities in need influencing fuel rates and in turn inflation, she cautioned that the policy could not be coming at a worse time.
“This is the time when long-term sustainable engagement matters one of the most. So, I would prompt policy makers [to] reconsider. This is a strategic mistake– improperly timed, severely executed,” Ilieva stated.
Nic Dillon, director of the Nous Group, highlighted that the levy policy isn’t happening in a vacuum, with changes to Fundamental Compliance Evaluation (BCA) metrics, modifications to visa guidelines for dependants and discussions about international trainees seeking asylum all interacting to create a best storm for UK global education.
However he said that regardless of the difficulties to the sector, some institutions were already setting their international charges at the incorrect level.
“Numerous, many universities are currently pricing incorrect by far more than the ₤ 925 of the levy,” he stated. “So ultimately, we’re dealing with our own errors of this magnitude. This [the levy] is just the government including another one.”
Meanwhile, partner at CIL Strategy Professional Patric Kirchner echoed that many universities’ pricing was “still rather immature” and not always value-based.
“It’s more like a procedure. So you need to run this process every year, you look at in 2015’s charges, then you possibly mark it up a bit here and there. But from my experience, what I have actually found out over the last month, it’s not extremely strategic,” he said.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/submit-your-nominations.jpg"/ >