In a 135-page ruling, Obama-appointed judge John McConnell stated regardless of following official visa processes, candidates had been “stuck waiting, for months on end, for advantage demands that USCIS refuses to adjudicate”.
“USCIS’s hang on adjudications can not be credited to anything that these people did incorrect; rather, it develops solely by the happenstance of their birth,” he concluded.
The court held that USCIS, a branch of the Department of Homeland Security (DoS), had violated immigration laws enacted by Congress, leaving swathes of individuals from the 39 travel restriction countries in “indeterminate legal limbo”.
The judgment varies from prior preliminary injunction wins, which usually limited relief to the named complainants in the case. In this instance, nevertheless, the judge left the underlying policies, carrying a far broader impact.
McConnell’s choice marks a victory for a union of immigrant service organisations and labour unions that submitted the case in March, challenging a number of USCIS policies that forever suspended applications for visa modifications and extensions for all travel ban countries.
The restrictive policies followed the shooting of 2 national Guardsmen in Washington DC by an Afghan nationwide in November 2025, after which Trump pledged to “completely pause” all migration from “third world countries”.
They included a nationwide hold on all asylum adjudications, a freeze on processing green cards, work permits and modification of status along with a retroactive re-review of migration benefits currently approved to people of travel ban countries, to name a few steps.
The ruling comes as graduating global trainees from the 39 countries face danger of detention or deportation if their visas expire and they are left out of status after the 60-day grace period for F-1 visa holders to leave the country, get a new visa, transfer organizations or begin work, which they can only do if USCIS resumes processing.
While USCIS should now resume adjudicating petitions and applications from travel ban nationals, experts have actually cautioned of prolonged hold-ups and possible future stops briefly if the agency picks to appeal the ruling.
USCIS’s hold on adjudications can not be attributed to anything that these individuals did wrong; rather, it develops solely by the happenstance of their birth
John McConnell, United States District Court
Trainees, revealing worries of remaining in limbo, have been recommended to get in touch with university consultants and migration lawyers on their specific scenarios.
More broadly, analysts have actually hailed the Rhode Island court decision a success for immigrant neighborhoods and the guideline of law.
“This ruling declares a standard concept: the federal government can not close down legal immigration paths or discriminate against people based on where they originate from,” stated Democracy Forward CEO Skye Perryman.
“Our neighborhoods should have a fair procedure federal government by law, not political targeting rooted in fear mongering and discrimination.”
The judgement came the exact same day the Senate approved a brand-new $70 billion migration enforcement costs making sure ICE, Border Patrol and other federal firms are moneyed for the remainder of Trump’s presidency.
DHS did not instantly react to The PIE News’s request for remark.
< img src ="// www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20viewBox='0%200%200%200'%3E%3C/svg%3E"/ > < img src="https://thepienews.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/1-1.jpg"/ >